By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support local journalism.
Europe has need for babies
Placeholder Image

MONTERCHI, ITALY – It was a lovely summer evening. Large families filled the terrace at La Pieve Vecchio, a restaurant occupying an old convent on the outskirts of this hilltop village in Tuscany. Some groups even included small children, perched in high chairs or wandering the dining area with an anxious parent trailing close behind.
That's a common scene in America but not in Europe, especially in Italy. Here, children are almost as rare as the truffles that were in high season and featured on La Pieve's menu. And that birth dearth is causing a crisis across the continent.
"As if it did not have enough problems with its never-ending fiscal and economic crisis," notes international economist Paolo von Schirach, "Europe is also afflicted by long-term, possibly terminal, demographic decline."
The impact of this decline has "already had noticeable effects, none of them good," he explains. Lower birth rates lead to aging populations, fewer young people in the workforce and a shrinking tax base.
As the New York Times recently reported from Germany, "Europe's plunge in fertility rates over the decades presents a problem that has frightening implications for the economy and the psyche of the continent."
The problem is particularly acute here in Italy, where the average birth rate is 1.39 children per female, far below the 2.1 needed to keep the population stable.
European birth rates have been dropping for many years. But the perspective from Monterchi offers an important insight into the immigration reform debate that has paused for August back in Washington but will resume in the fall.
Yes, Americans are somewhat more fertile than Europeans, but the United States has something else that is just as valuable to the economy as children. Foreigners.
Proponents of immigration reform have focused on the enormous economic benefits contributed by newcomers --starting new businesses, inventing new products, filling jobs others don't want. But they also foot the nation's bills. They help alleviate the "frightening implications for the economy" posed by an aging population that uses more services and pays fewer taxes.
Europe has far more trouble than America does in attracting and assimilating hard-working, bill-paying young immigrants. These are still largely homogenous countries that lack the diversity and tolerance that has always marked the New World culture.
Faced with this "demographic decline," European governments are struggling for answers. Some have provided lavish subsidies to young couples to bear more children. Others are trying to convince women to join and stay in the workforce. But these goals can be contradictory, especially for traditional European cultures that glorify stay-at-home mothers.
Europe would be far better off if it had young immigrants to do all that bending and reaching -- and to pay taxes on their earnings. They don't, but the United States does.
Steve and Cokie Roberts can be contacted by email at stevecokie@gmail.com.

Where Did that Come From? - No earthly idea
67d34d8ee38f5.webp

My good friend, Delores Green asked me about this one a few weeks ago. There are several ways “No earthly” is used in speech (idea, means, purpose or reason).

This simply means ‘no conceivable…’ as it is derived from relating to earthly means of thinking.

It is impos-

sible to tell exactly who first used this expression.

The earliest known citation to a form of this is in the Dissertation in The Lusiad; Or, The Discovery of India: An Epic Poem by Luís de Camões, translated into English by William Julius Mickle, published in London, 1778:

“In the first book, Jove summons a council of the Gods, which is described at great length, for no earthly purpose but to shew that he favoured the Portuguese.”

Here it could be said that ‘no earthly purpose’ was used because the council was said to have taken place in the heavens, thus it may be a literal application. But in 1832, a clearly figurative example showed up in Trials of the Persons Concerned in the Late Riots, Before Chief Justice of Great Britain, page 10:

“…where he (the Mayor) could have no earthly idea whether the military assistance was required at that precise time or not…”